off the charts
BEYOND THE NUMBERS
BEYOND THE NUMBERS
Why We Should Renew Federal Emergency Unemployment Insurance, Part 2
Part 1 of this post discussed the adverse consequences for the long-term unemployed and the economy if lawmakers let emergency federal unemployment insurance (UI) expire at the end of the month. As explained below, it would also be unprecedented to let the program expire when the economy is as far from full employment as it is now. Congress has authorized emergency federal UI in every major recession since 1958 and has always continued these programs until the labor market improved to the point where unemployed workers could find a job in a reasonable period of time. The highest unemployment rate at which we let any previous program expire was 7.2 percent. Unemployment will still be higher than that — 7.6 percent — at the end of next year, according to the November Blue Chip consensus forecast of private economists. Moreover, the amount of unemployment that specifically reflects weakness in the economy is much greater than when we let any previous program expire. The November unemployment rate of 7.7 percent includes 2.3 percentage points of “excess unemployment” caused by weak aggregate demand (because the economy is still a long way from fully recovering from the Great Recession), plus 5.4 percentage points of unemployment associated with other factors, including job turnover that exists even when jobs are plentiful. That 5.4 percent is the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) measure of what economists call the “natural rate of unemployment” or NAIRU (for “non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment). It’s what CBO estimates the unemployment rate would be if the economy were operating at full potential. As the chart shows, “excess unemployment” is much higher now than when any of the past four temporary federal UI programs expired. That’s partly because today’s unemployment rate is unusually high. But it’s also because today’s NAIRU of 5.4 percent is lower than it was in 1977 (6.3 percent) and 1985 (6.0 percent), meaning that there is more excess unemployment now at any given unemployment rate than there was then. For all of these reasons, President Obama and Congress should renew emergency federal unemployment insurance for another year.
Receive the latest news and reports from the Center