Social Security Keeps 20 Million Americans Out of Poverty:
A State-By-State Analysis
Social Security benefits play a vital role in reducing poverty. Without Social Security, according to the latest available Census data (for 2008), 19.8 million more Americans would be poor. Although most of those kept out of poverty by Social Security are elderly, nearly a third are under age 65, including 1.1 million children. (See Table 1.) Depending on their design, reductions in Social Security benefits could significantly increase poverty, particularly among the elderly.
|TABLE 1: |
Effect of Social Security on Poverty, 2008
|Age Group||Percent in Poverty||Number Lifted Out of Poverty by Social Security|
|Children Under 18||20.5||19.0||1,117,000|
|Adults Aged 18-64||14.5||11.7||5,281,000|
|Elderly Aged 65 and Over||45.2||9.7||13,410,000|
|Total, All Ages||19.8||13.2||19,808,000|
|Women Aged 65 and Over||49.7||11.9||8,120,000|
|Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, March 2009.|
Social Security Lifts 13 Million Elderly Americans Out of Poverty
Social Security reduces elderly poverty dramatically in every state in the nation, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 2. Without Social Security, the poverty rate for those aged 65 and over would exceed 40 percent in 42 states. With Social Security, the elderly poverty rate in the large majority of states is less than 10 percent. Social Security lifts 1.1 million elderly people out of poverty in California and Florida, almost 900,000 in Texas, and 800,000 in New York.
Social Security Lifts More Than 1 Million Children Out of Poverty
Social Security is important for children and their families as well as for the elderly. About 6 million children under age 18 (8 percent of all U.S. children) lived in families that received income from Social Security in 2008, according to Census data. Over 3 million children received their own benefits as dependents of retired, disabled, or deceased workers. Others lived with parents or relatives who received Social Security benefits. In all, 1.1 million children are lifted out of poverty by Social Security.
Social Security records show that 3.2 million children under age 18 qualified for Social Security payments themselves in December 2009. (See Table 3.) Of these, 1.3 million were the survivor of a deceased worker. Another 1.6 million received payments because their parent had a severe disability. And 301,000 children under 18 received payments because their parent or, in some cases, grandparent was retired. 
This analysis uses the official definition of poverty used by the Census Bureau. In determining poverty status, the Census Bureau compares a family’s cash income before taxes with poverty thresholds that vary by the size and age of the family. The poverty thresholds in 2008 were $10,326 for an elderly individual, $13,014 for an elderly couple, and $22,025 for an average family of four. To calculate the anti-poverty effects of Social Security, we determined each family’s poverty status twice — first excluding and then including the family’s Social Security benefits.
Our analysis uses data from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey (CPS), the survey that is used to produce official poverty estimates.  Each March the CPS collects information on personal income, health coverage, and other social and economic characteristics for the previous year. The national estimates reported here are for 2008. The state-by-state estimates are based on a three-year average (for 2006, 2007, and 2008) to improve the reliability of the results.
One critic of estimates such as these argues that they “do nothing to answer the question of what would have happened if Social Security had not existed.” Indeed, this analysis does not take into account other changes that would occur in the absence of Social Security. If Social Security did not exist, most elderly individuals likely would have saved somewhat more and worked somewhat longer.
Other studies confirm, however, that Social Security has made a very large contribution to reducing poverty, and that cutting Social Security benefits could substantially increase poverty among the elderly.
|TABLE 2: |
Effect of Social Security on Poverty Among the Elderly by State, 2006-2008
|Percent in Poverty||Number Lifted Out of Poverty by Social Security|
|Excluding Social Security||Including Social Security|
|District of Columbia||37.4||15.6||14,000|
|Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, March 2007-2009.|
|TABLE 3: |
Social Security Beneficiaries by State and Age, December 2009
|Total||Age 65 and Older||Children Under Age 18|
|District of Columbia||73,093||51,479||4,883|
|Source: Social Security Administration, Annual Statistical Supplement, 2010, Table 5.J5, and OASDI Beneficiaries by State and County, 2009. a Includes outlying areas and foreign countries (not shown).|
 Kathy A. Ruffing and Paul N. Van de Water, Top Ten Facts About Social Security, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, forthcoming.
 Social Security Administration, Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin, 2010, Table 5.J10.
 U.S. Census Bureau, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2008, Series P60-236, September 2009.
 Charles P. Blahous III, Reforming Social Security for Ourselves and Our Posterity, Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000, p. 13.
 Eugene Smolensky, Sheldon Danziger, and Peter Gottschalk, “The Declining Significance of Age in the United States: Trends in the Well-Being of Children and the Elderly Since 1939,” in John L. Palmer, Timothy Smeeding, and Barbara Boyle Torrey, eds., The Vulnerable, Washington: Urban Institute, 1988; Gary V. Engelhardt and Jonathan Gruber, “Social Security and the Evolution of Elderly Poverty,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10466, May 2004.