Vice President for Food Assistance Policy
With the House expected to vote in coming weeks on a proposal to “mindlessly gut” SNAP (formerly food stamps), as today’s New York Times editorial puts it, proponents are circulating misleading information about both the program and the proposed cuts. We will be issuing a series of posts, of which this is the first, that aims to set the record straight.
For this one, let’s review the basics. The nation’s most important anti-hunger program, SNAP provides modest benefits — less than $1.40 per person per meal next year — to help low-income families afford adequate food. SNAP households have very low incomes: four of five are below the poverty line ($23,550 for a family for four in 2013), and two of five are below half the poverty line (see chart).
Close to two-thirds of recipients are children, elderly, or disabled. Most SNAP families that include at least one working-age, non-disabled adult are working households. (See our chartbook for more information.)
As our new paper explains, the emerging proposal from House Republican leaders would push at least 4 million people off SNAP by cutting the program by some $40 billion over ten years — almost nine times the cut in the farm bill that the Senate passed in June.
The proposal includes the $20.5 billion in SNAP cuts in the farm bill that the House rejected in June, plus new provisions designed to cut at least another $20 billion in benefits.
The low-income people who face the loss of food assistance include many:
Next up: correcting misinformation about poor childless adults and SNAP.