off the charts
BEYOND THE NUMBERS
BEYOND THE NUMBERS
Voters Refuse to Tie Their Hands on State Revenues
Voters on Tuesday considered a host of ballot measures on tax and budget issues, but the most important from a long-term perspective may have been those in Florida, Michigan and New Hampshire. All three states rejected major constitutional amendments that would have handcuffed their ability to fund education, health care, and other services that are key to strong state economies.
- Florida voters rejected, by a decisive 58-42 margin, a formula-based revenue limit based on Colorado’s “TABOR,” which has led to deep cuts in education and health care over time. By nearly as wide a margin, voters also rejected a cap on property taxes for corporations and other nonresidential property owners.
- New Hampshire voters rejected an amendment barring the state from enacting a broad-based income tax. New Hampshire has neither a broad-based income tax nor a general sales tax, relying heavily on property and excise taxes. Its narrow tax base causes low-income families to pay much more in taxes than higher-income families, relative to their incomes, and makes it harder for the state to finance good schools and other infrastructure and services. The proposal would have created a major barrier to updating the tax code for changes in the economy and making the tax code fairer, and more adequate for funding services, as the New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute has explained.
- Michigan voters rejected, by a more than 2-1 margin, an amendment requiring a two-thirds vote in both houses of the legislature to pass any tax increase. This would have empowered a small minority of lawmakers to protect special-interest tax breaks and block new funds for schools, roads, health care, or other services, as the Michigan League for Public Policy has explained.
Receive the latest news and reports from the Center