off the charts
BEYOND THE NUMBERS
BEYOND THE NUMBERS
Under the 1996 welfare law, which replaced AFDC with the TANF block grant, states receive fixed federal funding each year in exchange for greater flexibility in using that funding. Unlike AFDC, therefore, federal TANF funding does not decrease in good economic times when cash assistance caseloads fall or rise in hard economic times when cash assistance caseloads increase. Given the dramatic decline in cash assistance caseloads I described in Monday’s post, today we look briefly at TANF funding over time and how states have spent their TANF dollars.State minimum required contributions to TANF have declined even more. To receive their full TANF block grant, states only have to spend on TANF purposes 80 percent of the amount they spent on AFDC and related programs in 1995, and that “maintenance of effort” requirement isn’t adjusted for inflation, either.All four posts in the series:
The TANF block grant’s value has declined by almost 30 percent over the last 15 years.Because the $16.6 billion annual federal TANF block grant was never adjusted for inflation, it has lost significant value over time. States receive 28 percent less in real (inflation-adjusted) dollars than they did in 1997, a year when the unemployment rate averaged just 4.9 percent.
TANF spending on cash assistance has declined dramatically.As TANF cash assistance caseloads have dropped, so has the amount of TANF spending used for this purpose. Federal and state TANF spending on basic assistance declined from $13.9 billion in 1997 to $9.3 billion in 2009, the most recent year available.
States have shifted their TANF funds to pay for a broad range of services, including some that Congress did not envision when it created the block grant.The declines in the TANF caseload, combined with broad state flexibility in the use of federal and state TANF funds, freed up substantial resources that states have used to fund other services. In 2009, states used just 28 percent of TANF funds to provide basic assistance, compared to 71 percent in 1997. In TANF’s early years, states used some of the freed-up funds for services directly related to welfare reform, such as increased child care assistance for recipients participating in work activities and low-income working families. As more funds were freed up, however, states increasingly used TANF funds to cover the costs of services that the TANF statute allows but that Congress did not anticipate, such as child welfare services. The need for basic assistance has increased sharply during the recent economic downturn. But states generally have not moved back the federal and state TANF funds they shifted to other areas of their budgets. Instead, facing fiscal constraints, states have been reducing funding for basic assistance, as well as work activities and child care assistance.
Stay up to date
Receive the latest news and reports from the Center