Pasar al contenido principal
fuera de serie
Perspectivas sobre las políticas
más allá de los números

Legislation Would Deliver Childless Adults in Every State a Larger EITC

Update, March 2, 2020: we’ve updated this post.

Some 19.3 million low-income adults who aren’t raising dependent children — the lone group that’s taxed into, or deeper into, poverty — would get a sizable increase in their Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) through the proposed Working Families Tax Relief Act, and these adults would come from every state in America.

They would include (per the state-by-state table below), 2.3 million in California, 1.5 million in Texas, 1.4 million in Florida, 745,000 in Ohio, 643,000 in Michigan, 633,000 in Georgia, 429,000 in Arizona, and 256,000 in Oklahoma.

The Working Families Relief Act, which was introduced this year in the Senate by Sherrod Brown, Michael Bennet, Richard Durbin, and Ron Wyden (with 42 co-sponsors) and in the House by Dan Kildee and Dwight Evans, would raise the maximum EITC for childless adults from roughly $530 today to $2,100.

It would reduce the number of workers aged 19 to 67 (other than full-time students) whom the federal tax code taxes into, or deeper into, poverty by about 91 percent — from 5.51 million today to fewer than 500,000.

The House Ways and Means Committee, in effect, made a down payment on this approach last month when it passed Chairman Richard Neal's Economic Mobility Act, which would expand the EITC for childless adults in 2019 and 2020.

For low- and moderate-income families with children, the EITC is an anti-poverty, income-boosting powerhouse. Childless adults who work hard at low-wage jobs face the same wage pressures as their co-workers with children. Yet even for those who qualify for it, the EITC is too small to give them a similar income lift — leaving some in this group taxed into, or deeper into, poverty.

The standard deduction, EITC, and Child Tax Credit are set at levels that ensure that families with children don’t have net income and payroll federal tax liability if they earn poverty-level wages. As a result, no families with children are taxed into poverty. Single childless adults, in contrast, begin owing income tax when their earnings are below the poverty line, and they receive little or no EITC. They also face significant payroll taxes.

Consider a 25-year-old single woman who works roughly 35 hours a week as a retail salesperson and earns the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. Her annual earnings of $13,340 are just at the poverty line. But federal taxes push her down into poverty:

Some $1,021 — 7.65 percent of her earnings — are withheld for Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes. She can claim a $12,200 standard deduction, leaving her with $1,140 in taxable income. Since she’s in the 10 percent tax bracket, she owes $114 in federal income tax. Thus, her combined federal income and payroll liability (before the EITC) is $1,135. She is eligible for a small EITC of $172. So, her net federal income and payroll tax liability is $963.

In short, federal taxes drive this woman $963 into poverty. The drafters of the Working Families Tax Relief Act made fixing this tax code flaw a top priority. Under the legislation, this woman’s EITC would rise to $1,797 and her after-tax income would rise to $662 above the poverty line.

The legislation would also give an EITC to many other working people who’ve been excluded in the past, such as young people who recently graduated high school and are starting out in the job market. It would lower the eligibility age from 25 to 19, to include this group. Similarly, people aged 65 to 67 and working for low wages would also be eligible.

In addition to extending the age limits, the legislation would extend to workers somewhat higher up the income scale. A childless adult working full-time for $8 an hour is now excluded from the EITC. Under the legislation, a childless adult making $10 an hour working full time as a cook would receive an EITC of about $730.

This important legislation would boost the incomes of childless adults in every state who work hard at low-wage jobs but are paid too little. It would fix a glaring flaw in the tax code and put the EITC’s anti-poverty power on the side of this group that’s now mostly excluded.

Childless Workers Who Would Benefit From Working Families Tax Relief Act, by State
State Number of Childless Workers
Total U.S. 19,332,600
Alabama 311,100
Alaska 47,000
Arizona 429,400
Arkansas 190,500
California 2,254,500
Colorado 336,000
Connecticut 167,100
Delaware 49,500
Dist. of Columbia 37,300
Florida 1,434,300
Georgia 633,000
Hawaii 82,200
Idaho 120,400
Illinois 691,300
Indiana 417,100
Iowa 185,400
Kansas 176,000
Kentucky 292,300
Louisiana 316,500
Maine 97,700
Maryland 284,600
Massachusetts 334,700
Michigan 642,500
Minnesota 313,800
Mississippi 190,300
Missouri 408,300
Montana 88,800
Nebraska 106,400
Nevada 191,800
New Hampshire 71,600
New Jersey 411,800
New Mexico 148,900
New York 1,106,300
North Carolina 657,300
North Dakota 41,900
Ohio 744,900
Oklahoma 255,800
Oregon 293,800
Pennsylvania 743,300
Rhode Island 56,700
South Carolina 344,000
South Dakota 54,800
Tennessee 439,800
Texas 1,532,600
Utah 157,400
Vermont 41,500
Virginia 478,800
Washington 416,300
West Virginia 119,300
Wisconsin 348,900
Wyoming 37,300

Source: CBPP estimates based on 2015-2017 American Community Survey data and March 2018 Current Population Survey data.

Chuck Marr
Vicepresidente de Política Tributaria Federal