SNAP Helps 1.2 Million Veterans With Low Incomes

Nearly 1.2 million veterans lived in households that participated in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps) between 2022 and 2024.[1] Veterans in every state — who may be unemployed, working in low-paying jobs, or have disabilities — use SNAP to supplement their low incomes to put food on the table for themselves and their families. (See Table 1 for state-by-state estimates.)

Yet the harmful 2025 Republican reconciliation law eliminated the work requirement exemption for veterans, which research consistently shows cuts many people off SNAP without increasing employment or earnings.[2] If these veterans can’t show that they are working 20 hours a week or prove that they qualify for a different exemption, they are limited to three months of SNAP benefits every three years. According to one estimate, about 260,000 veterans may be subject to the time limit and less than half of them reported usually working the hours needed to meet the requirement.[3] The law is taking food assistance away from millions of households with low incomes, including veterans,[4] who turn to SNAP for help affording groceries. Since the 2025 reconciliation law was enacted, the number of people receiving SNAP has declined sharply by 5.5 million (13 percent), even though there is no sign that the decline is due primarily to an improving economy.[5]

These losses reflect, in part, states’ response to the significant new fiscal pressures the 2025 reconciliation law created. Starting in October 2027, states must pay a portion of benefit costs for the first time in the program’s history. States’ obligations will be based on their “payment error rate,” a measure of states’ overpayments and underpayments of benefits from earlier years that largely reflect administrative mistakes. Faced with the threat of hundreds of millions, or even billions, of dollars in new annual costs,[6] states are scrambling to reduce their error rates. Congress should delay the new law’s cost shift for all states before the end of 2026, not just the few states already granted a delay under the reconciliation law, to give them time to improve payment accuracy without taking assistance away from eligible people, including veterans.

Many Veterans Face Employment, Health, Other Challenges

While veterans are a diverse group (see Figure 1), many face challenges making ends meet.

Lower employment rates. Historically, veterans have been slightly more successful than non-veterans at finding jobs when they look for work. However, a smaller share of all veterans are employed compared to non-veterans.[7] Veterans’ lower employment rate is largely due to the fact that fewer veterans are looking for work, since they have more health conditions and lower educational attainment.[8]

Also, Black and Latino veterans experience higher unemployment rates than white veterans ― a reflection of biased hiring practices, redlining, and other past and present systemic factors that limit economic mobility and opportunity.[9] The Department of Veterans Affairs projects that the share of veterans who identify as a race other than non-Hispanic white will grow from about 28 percent to 39 percent of the veteran population by fiscal year 2053.[10]

Veterans may face barriers to employment such as little work experience beyond military service, trouble finding employment that matches their skills, discrimination by employers, or lack of access to support services (e.g., military-to-civilian transition and veteran hiring services).[11] Many younger veterans are highly skilled, but civilian employers often undervalue their military experience. As a result, a larger share of younger veterans hold jobs for which they are overqualified compared to younger non-veterans with similar skills, which can add to job dissatisfaction and turnover. Also, some veterans are only offered low-paying jobs, which can make it difficult for them to meet their basic needs.[12]

Health conditions. Some veterans also face challenges from physical and mental health conditions related to their service that can affect their well-being. For example, some conditions that are more prevalent among recent veterans, such as traumatic brain injuries or post-traumatic stress disorder, have been linked to negative outcomes such as reduced labor force participation, increased risk of poor physical and mental health, and worse quality of life, including difficulty with community reintegration.[13] About 34 percent of all veterans have a service-connected disability — more than double the 2008 rate. And post-9/11 veterans, the youngest cohort, are more likely to have a service-connected disability than other veterans.[14]

Homelessness and other hardships. Due in part to the above factors, many veterans struggle to meet basic needs. According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s annual point-in-time survey in January 2025, over 32,000 veterans were experiencing homelessness, about 5.3 percent of all homeless adults.[15] Veterans with disabilities and without health insurance are also more likely to experience difficulty paying medical bills.[16] Veterans who lack stable employment, housing, or resources to cover medical expenses are likely to have difficulty affording enough to eat.

SNAP Can Help Address Food Insecurity Among Veterans

According to the Department of Agriculture, 11 percent of veterans ages 18 to 64 experienced food insecurity in 2015-2019. [17] Veterans were 7 percent more likely than non-veterans to experience food insecurity, after controlling for a range of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics that may contribute to differences in food insecurity rates between the two groups. Veterans of color were more likely than white veterans to experience food insecurity. In addition, veterans who had a disability, were unemployed, or had lower educational attainment were at greater risk of food insecurity. Another study found that among veterans, depression and suicidal thoughts were more common among those who were food insecure.[18]

For veterans struggling to feed their families, SNAP can make a crucial difference. However, research suggests that low-income veterans are less likely to participate in SNAP than the low-income population.[19] Among veterans, SNAP participation is higher for those who are most likely to be food insecure, including those who are young, have lower educational attainment, or are unemployed.[20]

In every state, low-income veterans rely on SNAP to help feed their families. California has the largest number of veterans participating in SNAP (118,000), followed by Texas and Florida (95,000 and 87,000, respectively). Oregon and Washington, D.C. have the highest share of veterans participating in SNAP, with about 14 percent of veterans living in households that receive SNAP, followed by New Mexico, Louisiana, and New York with about 10 percent.

SNAP provides critical support for veterans across the country who are struggling to feed their families after returning home from military service.

TABLE 1
Veterans Receiving SNAP Food Assistance, 2022-2024 Average
StateEstimated Number of Veterans Receiving SNAPEstimated Total Number of VeteransEstimated Share of Veterans Receiving SNAP
Alabama21,000302,0007%
Alaska4,00057,0007%
Arizona29,000443,0007%
Arkansas9,000172,0005%
California118,0001,260,0009%
Colorado23,000333,0007%
Connecticut9,000131,0007%
Delaware4,00061,0007%
District of Columbia3,00019,00014%
Florida87,0001,325,0007%
Georgia49,000606,0008%
Hawai‘i6,00083,0008%
Idaho6,000111,0005%
Illinois42,000461,0009%
Indiana17,000321,0005%
Iowa8,000159,0005%
Kansas7,000149,0005%
Kentucky16,000224,0007%
Louisiana22,000210,00010%
Maine7,00094,0008%
Maryland21,000324,0006%
Massachusetts20,000236,0009%
Michigan37,000449,0008%
Minnesota11,000258,0004%
Mississippi9,000148,0006%
Missouri20,000344,0006%
Montana4,00082,0004%
Nebraska4,00099,0004%
Nevada17,000194,0009%
New Hampshire4,00087,0004%
New Jersey13,000261,0005%
New Mexico14,000130,00010%
New York56,000568,00010%
North Carolina47,000618,0008%
North Dakota2,00042,0004%
Ohio44,000589,0008%
Oklahoma20,000237,0008%
Oregon33,000238,00014%
Pennsylvania61,000624,00010%
Rhode Island3,00043,0007%
South Carolina20,000348,0006%
South Dakota2,00055,0004%
Tennessee24,000397,0006%
Texas95,0001,408,0007%
Utah5,000109,0004%
Vermont3,00033,0008%
Virginia34,000612,0005%
Washington39,000464,0008%
West Virginia10,000106,00010%
Wisconsin17,000276,0006%
Wyoming1,00039,0002%
United States1,175,00015,939,0007%
Notes: Estimates are for veterans living in households that received any SNAP income during the 12 months prior to being surveyed. Estimates of SNAP participation in a given month would be lower. Estimates use three-year averages due to small sample sizes in some states in one-year data. These three-year estimates are rounded to the nearest thousand and may not add up to totals.
Source: CBPP analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-year series, 2022 to 2024

Notes on Methods

CBPP analyzed the 2022 to 2024 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year Public Use Microdata Sample for this state-level analysis. Veterans were identified as individuals who served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces but were not on active duty at the time of surveying.

The figures presented here represent our best estimate of the number of veterans living in households that received SNAP at some point during the 12 months prior to being surveyed. The analysis combines three years of data to improve the reliability of the state estimates. The ACS includes housing unit addresses and residents of group quarters, including shelters, but it omits any individuals experiencing homelessness who are not staying at an address for more than two months (e.g., with friends or family) or at a shelter at the time of surveying. Given that the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s 2025 Annual Homelessness Assessment Report found that 42 percent of veterans experiencing homelessness were unsheltered, the ACS likely undercounts homeless veterans. Additionally, survey respondents, including those in the ACS, often underreport program participation.

Disability as defined in Figure 1 includes anyone who self-reported having a disability in at least one of six core areas: hearing, seeing, cognitive, ambulatory, self-care, and/or independent living. SNAP’s definition of disability, for purposes of receiving special consideration within the program, is narrower and does not cover all individuals who may have disabilities. SNAP considers a person as disabled if they receive at least one of several types of disability benefits.

End Notes

[1] CBPP analysis of data from the 2022 to 2024 U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. This figure represents the annual average number of veterans who received SNAP at any point during the 12 months prior to being surveyed. Veterans are individuals who served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces but were not on active duty at the time of surveying. These estimates likely undercount veterans who receive SNAP because they omit veterans who are unsheltered; see Notes on Methods.

[2] Lauren Bauer and Chloe N. East, “A primer on SNAP work requirements,” The Hamilton Project, April 9, 2026, https://www.hamiltonproject.org/publication/paper/a-primer-on-snap-work-requirements/.

[3] Patrick D. Smith, Felisha Gonzalez, and Debra Saliba, “Characteristics of US Veterans Potentially Susceptible to SNAP Time Limits,” JAMA Health Forum, Vol. 7, No. 7, July 17, 2026, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2851340.

[4] Matt Mondschein, “’It’s shameful’: New Mexico veterans increasingly turn to food banks after SNAP rollbacks,” Source New Mexico, October 19, 2026, https://sourcenm.com/2026/10/19/its-shameful-new-mexico-veterans-increasingly-turn-to-food-banks-after-snap-rollbacks/.

[5] Dottie Rosenbaum et al., “SNAP Tracker: People Are Losing Food Assistance as the Harmful 2025 Republican Reconciliation Law Is Implemented,” CBPP, updated September 24, 2026, https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-tracker-people-are-losing-food-assistance-as-the-harmful-2025.

[6] Katie Bergh and Joseph Llobrera, “States’ First-Ever Bill for SNAP Benefits Could Cost Billions,” CBPP, June 24, 2026, https://www.cbpp.org/blog/states-first-ever-bill-for-snap-benefits-could-cost-billions.

[7] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 2003 to 2026 seasonally adjusted labor force participation rate, employment-population ratio, and unemployment rate data for 18-year-olds and older by veteran status, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11349526&series_id=LNS11349601&series_id=LNS12349526&series_id=LNS12349601&series_id=LNS14049526&series_id=LNS14049601.

[8] A New York Federal Reserve Bank analysis found that veterans’ employment rate is about 3 to 5 percentage points lower than comparable non-veterans. See Rajashri Chakrabarti, Dan Garcia, and Maxim Pinkovskiy, “Do Veterans Face Disparities in the Labor Market—And What Accounts for Them?” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, May 25, 2023, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2023/05/do-veterans-face-disparities-in-the-labor-market-and-what-accounts-for-them/.

[9] BLS, 2000 to 2026 not seasonally adjusted unemployment rate data for 18-year-olds and older by veteran status and race/ethnicity, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU04049526&series_id=LNU04049601&series_id=LNU04049532&series_id=LNU04049607&series_id=LNU04049535&series_id=LNU04049610&series_id=LNU04049538&series_id=LNU04049613&series_id=LNU04049529&series_id=LNU04049604. See Erik Gartland et al., “Where Households Using Federal Rental Assistance Live,” CBPP, March 5, 2025, https://www.cbpp.org/research/housing/where-households-using-federal-rental-assistance-live#milwaukee-highly-segregated-by-race-cbpp-anchor, for a brief example of the impact of redlining in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Also see Cary Funk and Kim Parker, “Blacks in STEM jobs are especially concerned about diversity and discrimination in the workplace,” Pew Research Center, January 9, 2018, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/09/blacks-in-stem-jobs-are-especially-concerned-about-diversity-and-discrimination-in-the-workplace/.

[10] U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, “VetPop2023: Projections of Our Nation's Veteran Population and Their Characteristics,” https://www.data.va.gov/stories/s/VetPop2023-Data-Story/yr7p-v5my/.

[11] Mary Keeling, Sara Kintzle, and Carl A. Castro, “Exploring U.S. Veterans’ post-service employment experiences,” Military Psychology, Vol. 30, Issue 1, February 28, 2018, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08995605.2017.1420976; Congressional Budget Office, “Labor Force Experiences of Recent Veterans,” May 2017, https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/reports/52418-laborforceveterans_0.pdf; Lisa Stern, “Post 9/11 Veterans With Service-Connected Disabilities and their Transition to the Civilian Workforce: A Review of the Literature,” Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 19, Issue 1, December 19, 2016, http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1523422316682928; Institute of Medicine, “Returning Home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Assessment of Readjustment Needs of Veterans, Service Members, and Their Families,” National Academies Press, March 12, 2013, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK206864/.

[12] Maury, Stone, and Roseman, op. cit.; Kim Parker et al., “The transition to post-military employment,” Pew Research Center, September 10, 2019, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/09/10/the-transition-to-post-military-employment/; Sara Kintzle et al., “Exploring the Economic & Employment Challenges Facing U.S. Veterans: A Qualitative Study of Volunteers of America Service Providers & Veteran Clients,” University of Southern California School of Social Work Center for Innovation and Research on Veterans & Military Families, May 2015, https://voa-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/pdf_file/file/762/A_Study_of_Volunteers_of_America_Service_Providers_and_Veteran_Clients.pdf; Melissa Boatwright and Sarah Roberts, “Veteran Opportunity Report: Understanding an untapped talent pool,” LinkedIn, https://socialimpact.linkedin.com/content/dam/me/linkedinforgood/en-us/resources/veterans/LinkedIn-Veteran-Opportunity-Report.pdf; Joseph Llobrera and Lauren Hall, “SNAP Helps Millions of Workers in Low-Paying Jobs,” CBPP, updated July 30, 2024, https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-helps-millions-of-workers-in-low-paying-jobs.

[13] Colleen E. Jackson et al., “Associations Among Increases in Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, Neurocognitive Performance, and Long-Term Functional Outcomes in U.S. Iraq War Veterans,” Journal of Traumatic Stress, Vol. 34, Issue 3, March 2, 2021, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts.22663; Helen Phipps et al., “Characteristics and Impact of U.S. Military Blast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review,” Frontiers in Neurology, Vol. 11, November 1, 2020, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.559318/full; Alicia A. Swan et al., “Long-term physical and mental health outcomes associated with traumatic brain injury severity in post-9/11 veterans: A retrospective cohort study,” Brain Injury, Vol. 32, Issue 13-14, October 1, 2018, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699052.2018.1518539; Rajeev Ramchand et al., “Prevalence of, risk factors for, and consequences of posttraumatic stress disorder and other mental health problems in military populations deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan,” Current Psychiatry Reports, May 2015, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25876141.

[14] BLS, “Employment Situation of Veterans – 2025,” April 28, 2026, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/vet.pdf; Jonathan Vespa and Caitlin Carter, “Trends in Veteran Disability Status and Service-Connected Disability: 2008-2022,” U.S. Census Bureau, November 2024, https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2024/demo/acs-58.pdf.

[15] U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, “The 2025 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress: Part 1: Point-in-time Estimates of Homelessness,” May 2026, https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/2025-AHAR-Part-1.pdf.

[16] Liyun Wu, Gang Wang, and Charles M.S. Birore, “Disabilities Status, Health Insurance, and Medical Hardship among Veterans,” Social Work in Public Health, Vol. 33, Issue 7-8, November 30, 2018, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19371918.2018.1546253.

[17] Matthew P. Rabbitt and Michael D. Smith, “Food Insecurity Among Working-Age Veterans,” U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service, May 2021, https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/101269/ERR-829.pdf?v=45327. In this study, food insecurity is measured at the household level — individual veterans and non-veterans were assigned their household’s food insecurity status.

[18] Nipa P. Kamdar et al., “Risk for depression and suicidal ideation among food insecure US veterans: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study,” Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol. 56, March 26, 2021, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-021-02071-3.

[19] One study estimated about 1 in 5 low-income veterans (with incomes less than 185 percent of the federal poverty line) participate in SNAP, using data from 2008 to 2012. While not a direct comparison, USDA reported that 83 percent of all eligible SNAP people participated in 2012, suggesting low-income veterans are less likely to participate in SNAP than the low-income population. See Andrew S. London and Colleen M. Heflin, “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Use Among Active-Duty Military Personnel, Veterans, and Reservists,” Population Research and Policy Review, August 7, 2015, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11113-015-9373-x and Karen E. Cunnyngham, “Reaching Those in Need: Estimates of State SNAP Participation Rates in 2012,” USDA, February 2015, https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap/reaching-those-need-estimates-state-participation-rates-2012.

[20] Jennifer A. Pooler et al., “Prevalence and Risk Factors for Food Insecurity Among Low-Income US Military Veterans,” Public Health Reports, Vol. 136, Issue 5, January 21, 2021, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0033354920974662.