Farm Bill

House to Vote on Unprecedented Amendment that Would Hold Millions of the Most Vulnerable Americans Hostage to Farm-Bill Politics

The House will debate tonight — and will vote tomorrow — on an amendment to the farm bill that would hold millions of the nation’s poorest children, parents, and elderly and disabled people hostage to Congressional farm-bill politics.

The amendment would slash Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as Food Stamps) benefits across the board — and by large amounts — if, as has occurred in the past, a bill reauthorizing farm programs and SNAP has not been enacted by the time the previous farm bill expires. Read more
 

House Agriculture Committee Farm Bill Would Cut Nearly 2 Million People Off SNAP

The farm bill, to be considered by the House of Representatives this week, would cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by almost $21 billion over the next decade, eliminating food assistance to nearly 2 million low-income people, mostly working families with children and senior citizens.

The cuts would come on top of an across-the-board reduction in benefits that every SNAP recipient will experience starting November 1. Read more

Related:

Immigration

Benefit Restrictions Beyond Those in Senate Immigration Bill Would Jeopardize Legalization for Many and Risk Severe Hardships for Others

Some senators have proposed changes to the bipartisan immigration bill that would make it much more difficult for large numbers of undocumented workers to convert to legal status and would discourage or prohibit legal immigrants, and in some cases their U.S. citizen family members, from receiving needed assistance.

Such changes would not only harm immigrants converting to legal status but also imperil millions of children, an important part of our future workforce.  Read more

Related: Immigration Bill’s “Back Taxes” Amendment Much Harder to Implement than Senator Hatch Suggests

 

More: Food Assistance analyses

Facing Our Fiscal Challenges

Too Little to Go Around:
House Appropriations Plan to Increase Defense and Homeland Security Requires Even Deeper Cuts in Other Programs

"The House Appropriations Committee on May 21st approved, on a party-line vote, a plan to apportion discretionary funding for fiscal year 2014 among its 12 appropriations subcommittees in a way that would override a key provision of the 2011 Budget Control Act (BCA) and shift tens of billions of dollars from domestic programs to defense and other security programs.

"The plan, crafted by Chairman Harold Rogers, is designed to largely reflect the priorities in the budget resolution that the House passed in March. Total discretionary funding under the Rogers plan would equal the total amount that the BCA allows in 2014 if sequestration remains in effect. But defense would receive substantially more funding — and non-defense programs would receive substantially less — than the BCA allows under sequestration."

The Rogers Plan:

  • Would Increase Defense, Cut Non-Defense Programs Outside Security
  • Highlights Inadequacy of Overall Funding Under Sequestration
  • Has Funding Levels Below President’s and Senate’s Levels

Read more

  1. Jobs
  2. RSS
  3. Contact Us
 

Sign Up for E-Mail Alerts

RSS Feeds

Multimedia

Browse Reports