The Budget Debate and Health Reform

Individual Mandate Delay Would Mean Millions More Uninsured, Higher Premiums
House Republicans attached a one-year delay of health reform’s individual mandate — which will require most Americans to obtain health coverage or pay a penalty starting in 2014 — to a Senate-passed bill to fund the government in fiscal year 2014.
Such a delay would adversely affect millions of Americans.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that it would cause 11 million more Americans to remain uninsured in 2014 and result in higher premiums for many others. It also would disrupt the new health insurance exchanges just as the open enrollment season is about to begin. Read more
Greenstein in Politico: Despite Claims, Obamacare Gives Congress No Special Treatment
Some health reform opponents claim the Obama administration is giving members of Congress and their staffs special treatment under the Affordable Care Act.
The claim, which a number of media stories have repeated uncritically, is simply false: Although they will be required to enroll in health plans offered within the new health-insurance exchanges established under the law, members of Congress and their staffs will not receive extra financial help to pay for their medical care. Read more
Excise Tax on Medical Devices Should Not Be Repealed
House Republicans attached to a Senate-passed funding bill for fiscal year 2014 a provision to repeal the 2.3-percent excise tax on medical devices that policymakers enacted in 2010 to help pay for health reform. The excise tax is sound, however, and the arguments against the tax don’t withstand scrutiny.
The tax does not single out the medical device industry for unfair treatment. The tax will not cause manufacturers to shift production overseas. The tax will have little effect on innovation in the medical device industry. Read more
Argument for One-Year Delay of Health Reform Riddled with Flaws
In an effort by health reform’s opponents to defund, unravel, or delay the law, House Republicans attached to a Senate-passed bill to fund the government in fiscal year 2014 a one-year delay of health reform.
We should see the push for a one-year delay, buttressed by misleading and inaccurate arguments and the selective use or omission of relevant data, for what it is: a core element of an effort to impede and ultimately dismember health reform so that it never comes to pass. Read more
Related:
More: Federal Budget Analyses
Threats to SNAP
Greenstein: House SNAP Bill Would Cut Food Assistance to Millions of Poor Americans
The House’s passage of the Republican leadership’s bill to cut SNAP (formerly known as food stamps) by almost $40 billion over the next decade marks a new low for an already dysfunctional Congress. It would increase hunger and hardship all across our country.
By cutting food assistance for at least 3.8 million low-income people in the coming year — including some of the very poorest Americans, many children and senior citizens, and even veterans — this cruel, if not heartless, legislation could jeopardize a vital stepping stone to many families who are still struggling to find work or who depend on low-wage jobs. Read more
Cuts in House Leadership SNAP Bill Would Affect Millions of Low-Income Americans
The House has passed the Republican leadership’s proposal to cut SNAP (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as the food stamp program) by at least $39 billion over ten years. This is almost double the cut in the House Agriculture Committee farm bill and about ten times the SNAP cut in the Senate-passed farm bill.Read more
Related:
- Robert Greenstein Commentary: Portraying Severe SNAP Benefit Cuts As a Mere Work Requirement
- Statement: Stacy Dean, Vice President, Food Assistance Policy, on New USDA Report on “Food Insecurity”
- Infographic: House SNAP Provision Would End Food Assistance To Needy Childless Unemployed Adults
- SNAP Benefits Will Be Cut for All Participants In November 2013
- Round-Up: Everything You Need to Know About SNAP
- More:
- Food Assistance analyses
New From the Center
-
Community Eligibility: Making High-Poverty Schools Hunger Free
October 1, 2013
-
Testimony of Chad Stone, Chief Economist, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Before the Senate Committee on Budget
September 24, 2013
-
Correcting Five Myths About Medicaid
September 24, 2013
-
Census Data Show Poverty and Inequality Remained High in 2012 and Median Income Was Stagnant, But Fewer Americans Were Uninsured
September 20, 2013
-
Share of Americans Without Health Coverage Edged Down Again in 2012
September 19, 2013
- More:
- View All
Center in the News
Our Final Debt Ceiling Offer Is This: Nothing
U.S. News & World Report
September 27, 2013
Can the Threat of Defunding Education Slow Down Tax Cuts?
Governing
September 26, 2013
Proper school funding is the best option for growth
Kansas City Star
September 21, 2013
Free to Be Hungry
New York Times
September 13, 2013
All Budget Deals Are Not Created Equal
U.S. News and World Report
September 19, 2013
Food Stamp Work Requirements Not Just For Surfer Dudes In New Bill
Huffington Post
September 19, 2013
Food stamp rise belies economic recovery
USA Today
September 19, 2013
A Friendly Reminder That Defunding Obamacare Won’t Stop the Law
National Journal
September 18, 2013
Household Incomes Remain Flat Despite Improving Economy
New York Times
September 18, 2013
Yes, the Rich are Getting Richer
Black Voice News
September 17, 2013
Food Stamps Kept 4 Million Out Of Poverty In 2012
Huffington Post






