820 First
Street, NE
Suite 510
Washington, DC 20002
Tel: 202-408-1080
Fax: 202-408-1056
[email protected]
www.cbpp.org
Robert Greenstein
Executive Director
Iris J. Lav
Deputy Director
Board of Directors
David de Ferranti, Chair
The World Bank
John R. Kramer, Vice Chair
Tulane Law School
Henry J. Aaron
Brookings Institution
Ken Apfel
University of Texas
Barbara B. Blum
Columbia University
Marian Wright Edelman
Children’s Defense Fund
James O. Gibson
Center for the Study of Social Policy
Beatrix Hamburg, M.D.
Cornell Medical College
Frank Mankiewicz
Hill and Knowlton
Richard P. Nathan
Nelson A Rockefeller
Institute of Government
Marion Pines
Johns Hopkins University
Sol Price
Chairman, The Price Company (Retired)
Robert D. Reischauer
Urban Institute
Audrey Rowe
ACS, Inc.
Susan Sechler
Rockefeller Foundation
Juan Sepulveda, Jr.
The Common Experience/
San Antonio
William Julius Wilson
Harvard University |
UP TO 1.6 MILLION LOW-INCOME PEOPLE
— INCLUDING ABOUT HALF A MILLION CHILDREN —
ARE LOSING HEALTH COVERAGE DUE TO STATE BUDGET CUTS
Driven by flagging revenues and deep
budget deficits, 34 states have made cuts over the past two years
in public health insurance programs such as Medicaid and the
State Children’s
Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP), a new Center report finds.
Some 1.2 million to 1.6 million low-income people — including
490,000 to 650,000 children and large numbers of parents,
seniors, and people with disabilities — have lost publicly funded
health coverage as a result.
A second Center report, also released today, examines
one reason for the loss of coverage: six states — Alabama,
Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Montana, and Utah — have stopped
enrolling eligible children in their SCHIP programs, denying
coverage to tens of thousands of eligible low-income children.
“Cuts of this magnitude in health coverage for
low-income families are unprecedented,” stated Leighton Ku, a
senior fellow at the Center. “The ripple effects of these
cuts will be felt across the states. Most of the people who
lose public coverage will become uninsured. Burdens also
will increase on public and private hospitals and clinics that
provide some care to the uninsured (often after untreated health
problems have developed into more serious health conditions).”
“The cuts also will mean fewer federal
matching dollars going into the states,” Ku added. A state loses
up to $4 in federal matching funds for every dollar that it cuts
state Medicaid funding and up to $7 in federal matching funds for
every dollar it cuts state SCHIP expenditures.
Cuts Will Drive Up
the Number of the Uninsured
Some 43.6 million Americans were uninsured in 2002
(the most recent year available), a 2 million increase since
2001. The weak job market and losses in private health
coverage were the main reasons for the increase.
The number of uninsured Americans would
have grown by several million more if Medicaid and SCHIP
enrollment had not increased during the economic downturn to help
compensate for the loss of private coverage. These programs are
designed to play this “counter-cyclical” role by expanding during
periods of labor market weakness, when many workers lose their
jobs — and with it, their employer-sponsored health coverage —
and become eligible for publicly funded coverage instead.
The Medicaid and SCHIP cuts now taking place will weaken the
programs’ ability to compensate for the loss of private coverage and cause
the number of uninsured Americans to go still higher.
States Cutting Enrollment in
a Variety of Ways
Some states have cut enrollment by
restricting Medicaid or SCHIP eligibility. For example,
Missouri lowered the Medicaid eligibility limit for parents from 100 percent
of the poverty line to 77 percent (from $15,260 for a family of three to
$11,750).
Other states have adopted policies that
do not directly limit eligibility but result in lower enrollment by making it
more difficult to enroll in the program or retain coverage. Several states
have instituted or raised monthly premiums. Several other states have
adopted policies that impose added red tape on program participants, such as
requiring families to reapply for the program every 6 months rather than
annually. Such changes can cause many eligible people to lose coverage,
including poor families who cannot afford to pay higher premiums or working
families who cannot take time off from work for frequent trips to government
offices to renew their eligibility. After Oregon
increased its Medicaid premiums, for example, enrollment fell by 40,000
people or more than one-third.
Temporary Fiscal Relief
Helped, But Additional Cuts Are Likely in 2005
A number of states have averted even deeper cuts in Medicaid and
SCHIP because of the enactment earlier this year of $20 billion in federal
fiscal relief for states. Half of these funds are in the form of a temporary
hike in the federal Medicaid matching rate so states pay a smaller share of
total Medicaid costs. Ohio and New Jersey, for example, each used fiscal
relief funds to prevent planned cutbacks of Medicaid eligibility for
low-income adults that would have reduced caseloads by about 60,000 in each
state. The number of states instituting Medicaid cuts dropped substantially
after the fiscal relief funds became available.
However, the temporary increase in federal Medicaid matching
rates is scheduled to expire on July 1, 2004. This will intensify pressures
on state budgets for state fiscal year 2005, which begins on July 1 in most
states. States face projected deficits of $40 billion to $50 billion in the
upcoming fiscal year, despite the recent uptick in the economy. As a result,
further Medicaid and/or SCHIP cuts are likely in many states in the coming
year.
In addition, about nine states will run out of federal SCHIP
funds in federal fiscal year 2005 (which starts October 1, 2004) because of
problems with both the level of federal SCHIP funds and the formula for
distributing them. These states will be under pressure to reduce their SCHIP
caseloads. Even more states will exhaust their federal SCHIP funds in 2006
and 2007. Finally, proposals to cap federal funding for Medicaid (such as
the Administration’s block grant proposal) could increase states’ budget
difficulties and ultimately lead to further Medicaid cuts.
SCHIP Freezes Will Increase
the Number of Uninsured Children
The decision by six states to stop accepting eligible
children into their SCHIP programs generally affect children in families with
incomes between 100 percent or 133 percent of the poverty line and 200
percent of poverty. (Families with incomes below these levels are
generally covered by Medicaid, which is not affected by the freeze.)
Three of the six states are putting SCHIP-eligible children
on a waiting list. In the other three states, families are told to
re-apply if and when enrollment re-opens in the future.
The freeze generally applies to eligible newborns as well as
other children. This means newborn infants in low-income families are
being denied coverage despite their vulnerability — and the critical
importance of health care — in their first days and months of life.
Exactly how many children are affected by the six states’
decision to stop accepting eligible new SCHIP applicants is unknown, since
three of the states do not maintain waiting lists. Florida’s
waiting list contained more than 44,000 eligible children as of November 14.
“These SCHIP freezes threaten the nation’s recent progress in
providing health coverage to low-income children,” said Donna Cohen Ross, lead author of the report on the SCHIP freezes.
“Since SCHIP was created in 1997, the number of low-income children who are
uninsured has declined. Yet 6.8 million low-income children still lack
insurance, and the ban on new SCHIP enrollment in these states is going to
worsen the problem.”
Changing Course
The Center reports note that further cuts that cause more
low-income people to lose insurance could largely be averted, and many of the
recent cuts reversed, if federal and state policymakers would make changes in
budget priorities. A continuation of federal fiscal relief to states for
another year in light of continuing state budget crises, and state decisions
to put off limits further cuts that cause low-income people to become
uninsured, would help significantly, the Center said.
Center executive director Robert Greenstein noted that the Bush
Administration has given indications it will propose a health insurance
initiative in coming months. “Any such initiative should start with an
extension of temporary financial assistance to states for another year to
avoid casting more of the nation’s poorest and most vulnerable citizens into
the ranks of the uninsured,” he said.
“A ‘health insurance initiative’ that consists primarily of
further tax cuts packaged with a ‘health insurance’ label and fails to do
anything about cutbacks in health insurance at the state level that are
affecting the neediest Americans will be disappointing,” he added.
The Center’s two reports —
Losing Out: States Are Cutting
1.2 to 1.6 Million Low-Income People from Medicaid, SCHIP and Other State Health
Insurance Programs and a
summary version of
Out in the Cold: Enrollment Freezes in Six State
Children’s
Health
Insurance Programs Withhold Coverage from Eligible Children — are
available on the Center’s website
https://www.cbpp.org. The full version of the latter report has been
published by the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured and is
available at
http://www.kff.org.)

States That
Cut Enrollment in Medicaid, SCHIP or Other State Health Insurance Programs:
Summary of State Policies and Impacts in State Fiscal Years 2003 and 2004 |
State |
Estimate of Number Affected |
Brief Description of
Cuts |
United States |
1.2 million to 1.6
million (490,000 to 650,000 children) |
Cuts adopted in 34
states in state fiscal years 2003 and 2004. Almost half of the cuts are
targeted at children, but there also are cuts that end coverage for
low-income parents, pregnant women, senior citizens, people with
disabilities, childless adults, and immigrants. |
Alabama |
3,000 to 4,000 |
Stopped admitting
eligible low-income children in
SCHIP. Increased monthly premiums for children in SCHIP. |
Alaska |
1,600 |
Reduced income limit
for children in SCHIP from 200 percent of the poverty line ($38,000 for a
family of three in Alaska) to 175 percent ($33,000). Eliminated
inflation adjustments on income limits for children in SCHIP and for
pregnant women and aged and disabled people in Medicaid, so that income
limits decline as a percentage of the poverty line. |
Arizona |
no estimate |
Created enrollment
barriers by requiring children,
adults and certain aged and disabled people to submit paperwork every 6
months, rather than permitting 12-month continuous eligibility. Have
announced plans to increase premiums for SCHIP children with incomes
between 150 percent of the poverty line and 200 percent.
|
Arkansas |
no estimate |
Increased monthly
premiums for disabled children in
a special Medicaid waiver program who receive health services at home and
would otherwise be institutionalized. |
California |
250,000 to 500,000 |
Created barriers
that make it harder for low-income parents to stay enrolled in Medicaid.
Reduced eligibility for transitional Medicaid, so that parents have
coverage for up to 12 months after leaving welfare for work, instead of 24
months. (In addition, Gov. Schwarzenegger has just proposed to stop
enrolling additional eligible low-income children in SCHIP and to stop
admitting immigrants in other health coverage programs, affecting an
additional 114,000 children and 78,000 immigrants. These proposals are not
included in the estimates of the cuts enacted in California.) |
Colorado |
16,300 |
Stopped admitting
eligible low-income children and pregnant women
in SCHIP. (Also passed legislation to end Medicaid coverage for 3,500 legal
immigrants. This is currently subject to an injunction because of a legal
challenge and is not counted in our estimate.) |
Connecticut |
20,500 |
Reduced Medicaid
income eligibility limit for low-parents
from 150 percent to 100 percent of the poverty line (from ($22,890 to
$15,260 for a family of three). Because of an injunction, implementation
has been delayed and many of these parents are receiving transitional
Medicaid benefits. They will eventually lose coverage, however, when their
transitional benefits expire. Created enrollment barriers for children
that make it harder to apply for Medicaid from clinics and make it harder
for children to remain enrolled by requiring their families to submit
paperwork every 6 months, rather than permitting 12-month coverage.
Stopped admitting recent legal immigrants to state-funded Medicaid. |
Florida |
74,000 |
Stopped admitting
low-income eligible children in
SCHIP and places them on a waiting list instead. About 44,000 have been
placed on this list since July 2003. This is in addition to a waiting list
of about 27,000 that already existed for immigrant and other children.
Cut Medicaid income eligibility limits for seniors and people with
disabilities from 90 percent of the poverty line to 88 percent (from
$8,082 for a single senior to $7,902) |
Indiana |
32,000 to 40,000 |
Created enrollment
barriers by requiring Medicaid
children to submit paperwork every 6 months, rather than permitting 12-month
coverage. Reduced Medicaid income limits for seniors and people with
disabilities by narrowing methods of computing disposable income
(currently blocked by lawsuit, so this cut is not counted). |
Iowa |
no estimate |
Increased premiums
for working disabled people's Medicaid coverage. |
Kansas |
no estimate |
Increased enrollment
barriers so that fewer people who
have left welfare for work retain their Medicaid coverage. |
Kentucky |
3,000 |
Instituted monthly
premiums for children in
SCHIP and for certain families who receive Medicaid benefits after leaving
welfare for work. Terminated Medicaid coverage of parents who do not
meet work requirements in welfare program. Reduced amounts that an
institutionalized person's spouse can keep. |
Louisiana |
no estimate |
Reduced Medicaid
income limit for seniors and people with disabilities
by narrowing methods of counting disposable
income. |
Maryland |
5,000 |
Stopped admitting
eligible children in SCHIP who
have incomes between 200 percent and 300 percent of the poverty line
(between $30,520 and $45,060 for a family of three). Imposed monthly
premiums for children with incomes between 185 percent of the poverty
line and 200 percent ($28,230 to $30,520 for a family of three) in SCHIP,
which has resulted in a decline in enrollment of children in that income
range by about half. |
Massachusetts |
13,900 |
Temporarily ended
insurance coverage for certain
long-term unemployed people. Eliminated health insurance eligibility
for certain immigrants. Increased premiums for some low-income
children in Medicaid. Reduced Medicaid eligibility for certain
adults by adding an asset limit. |
Minnesota |
35,000 |
Cut eligibility and
benefits for certain low-income adults
who do not have children. Reduced Medicaid eligibility for newborn
infants whose mothers were on Medicaid from 24 months to 12 months. Other
miscellaneous cuts. |
Missouri |
32,00 to 42,700 |
Lowered Medicaid
income eligibility limit for parents
from 100 percent of the poverty line to 77 percent (from $15,260 for a
family of three to $11,750). Because of a court injunction some of these
parents are retaining transitional Medicaid benefits, but they will lose
Medicaid coverage when their transitional benefits expire. Eliminated
Medicaid coverage of non-custodial parents. Reduced duration of
transitional Medicaid benefits for parents leaving welfare for
employment. |
Montana |
no estimate |
Stopped admitting
eligible low-income children in
SCHIP and place them on a waiting list. |
Nebraska |
28,700 |
Cut income
eligibility limits for children and parents
by changing methods of counting income and
household composition rules. This is delayed by a court injunction, but the
people will lose coverage when their transitional Medicaid benefits expire.
Created enrollment barriers by making it more difficult for children
to apply for Medicaid from health clinics. Ended Medicaid coverage
for poor 19 and 20 year olds. |
Nevada |
2,900 |
Cut Medicaid income
limits for unemployed workers by
changing methods of accounting for unemployment benefits. |
New Jersey |
1,900 |
Stopped admitting new
low-income parents applying for NJ
Family Care. Terminated coverage for certain immigrants and adults. |
North Carolina |
no estimate |
Reduced Medicaid
eligibility limits for certain seniors and people with disabilities
by changing methods computing assets in
determining eligibility. Reduced Medicaid coverage for low-income
parents and children who left welfare for work from two years to one.
(Preliminary data indicate that under the latter change about 51,000 parents
and children will no longer be eligible. But some of them will retain
Medicaid coverage under a different eligibility category, however, so the
net reduction in enrollment is not yet clear.) |
North Dakota |
2,600 |
Reduced Medicaid
eligibility for two-parent families
with a parent who works more than 100 hours per month . Narrowed
eligibility for certain seniors. |
Oklahoma |
8,300 |
Ended Medicaid
coverage for low-income parents, children and seniors
whose gross incomes are above the Medicaid limits but who incur high medical
expenses that reduce their disposable incomes to a level below the Medicaid
limit. |
Oregon |
40,000 |
Increased monthly
premiums for low-income people in
Medicaid (now called Oregon Health Plan Standard). Also restricted other
eligibility criteria. As a result, more than one-third of those
previously enrolled have lost coverage. Ended Medicaid coverage for
those whose gross incomes are above the Medicaid limits but who incur high
medical expenses that reduce their disposable incomes to a level below the
Medicaid limit. Cancelled earlier plans to expand coverage for adults with
incomes over the poverty line. |
Rhode Island |
1,200 |
Increased monthly
premiums for families with
children in Rite Care. |
South Carolina |
7,000 |
Reduced Medicaid
income limit for parents by adding
a limit on gross income. Created enrollment barrier by increasing
paperwork requirements to renew children's Medicaid coverage. |
Tennessee |
150,000 |
Broad reductions in
eligibility for TennCare. About
200,000 lost coverage in July 2002 when the state required that large
numbers of beneficiaries reapply. While the state has permitted a grace
period during which those who lost coverage may reapply, only a limited
number are expected to successfully re-enroll. Reduced eligibility
for "uninsurable" people with chronic health problems who cannot get private
health insurance. Stopped admitting eligible low-income children
into TennCare unless they have incomes below 100 percent of the poverty line
(for children six and older), below 133 percent of the poverty line (for
children one to six) or below 185 percent of the poverty line (for infants
under one). |
Texas |
344,000 to 494,000 |
Imposed an asset test
for children in SCHIP, increased monthly premiums for some children in SCHIP
and imposed premiums for the first time for others, and instituted changes
to make it harder for children to stay enrolled in
SCHIP. This will reduce enrollment in SCHIP
by about one-third. In addition, those children who are admitted in SCHIP
will not be not be covered for medical care in their first three months in
the program. Delayed plans to reduce enrollment barriers for
children in Medicaid by postponing implementation of plans to streamline
eligibility by enrolling children for 12- month periods and requiring more
burdensome enrollment procedures for some children. Cut Medicaid income
eligibility limit for pregnant women from 185 percent of the poverty
line to 158 percent (from $22,420 for family of two to $19,150).
Eliminated Medicaid coverage for low-income adults whose gross
incomes are above the Medicaid income limit but who incur high medical
expenses that reduce their disposable incomes to a level below the Medicaid
income limit. Terminated Medicaid coverage for parents who do not
meet work requirements for welfare. |
Utah |
no estimate |
Stopped admitting
eligible, low-income children
in SCHIP. |
Vermont |
10,000 |
Instituted or
increased monthly premiums for
certain low-income adults, children and seniors in health coverage programs. |
Virginia |
no estimate |
Made eligibility
rules more restrictive for
transitional Medicaid coverage, under which low-income adults retain
Medicaid when they leave welfare for work. Eliminated inflation
adjustments in Medicaid income limits for certain seniors and people
with disabilities, so that eligibility, as a percentage of the poverty line,
will erode over time. |
Washington |
116,000 |
Ended Medicaid
eligibility for recent legal
immigrants. Increased enrollment barriers for children and parents
that make it more difficult for them to stay enrolled in Medicaid.
Announced plans to increase premiums for low-income children in Medicaid
and SCHIP. (On December 18, Gov. Locke proposed eliminating the premiums
for some of the children and reducing premiums for others. If this is
approved by the legislature, then fewer children would lose coverage.)
Reduced cap on the number of people who can be served by the Basic
Health program by 36,000. |
Wisconsin |
1,600 |
Created enrollment
barriers for working families
applying for BadgerCare by requiring further paperwork to verify income.
Increased premiums for families with incomes above 150 percent of the
poverty line. Reduced eligibility for seniors by modifying methods
of counting assets and changing rules related to amounts that spouses may
retain. |
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization and policy institute that
conducts research and analysis on a range of government policies and
programs. It is supported primarily by foundation grants.
# # # #
|