Media Contact
Jacob Kaufman-Waldron
Communications Specialist
The gaps between the incomes of the richest households and low- and middle-income households are wide and growing in most states, according to a major new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Economic Policy Institute that examines inequality at the state level.
Across all states, the average income of the richest fifth of households was eight times that of the poorest fifth as of the late 2000s. New Mexico, Arizona, California, Georgia, New York, Louisiana, Texas, Massachusetts, Illinois, and Mississippi face the largest gaps.
“Prolonged growth in income inequality undermines the basic American belief that hard work should pay off,” said Elizabeth McNichol, co-author of the report and senior fellow at the Center. “Anyone who contributes to the nation’s economic growth should reap the benefits of that growth. But for decades now, those benefits have been skewed in favor of the wealthiest members of society.”
The long-standing trend of growing income inequality continued between the late 1990s and the mid-2000s.
Incomes fell by close to 6 percent among the bottom fifth of households, on average, while rising by 8.6 percent among the top fifth, during this period. Incomes grew even faster — 14 percent — among the top 5 percent of households. For the middle fifth of households, incomes grew by just 1.2 percent.
In 45 states and the District of Columbia, gaps between the richest and the poorest households widened during this period and narrowed in none. Average incomes grew more quickly among the top fifth of households than among the bottom fifth in most states.
“For low- and middle-income families, the 2000s were a lost decade of falling incomes and economic insecurity,” said Doug Hall, co-author of the report and Director of the Economic Analysis and Research Network (EARN) at the Economic Policy Institute. “That’s not only harmful to these families, but it also threatens our future economic growth.”
Inequality has been growing for decades. Since the 1970s, rich households’ incomes have grown much faster in every state than have the incomes of poor and middle-income households. In contrast, from World War II through the mid 1970s, the gains of economic growth were more evenly shared across the income scale.
The study, based on inflation-adjusted Census data, is one of the few to examine income inequality at the state level. It measured and compared income trends among the highest-, middle-, and lowest-income families in four periods — the late 1970s, the late 1990s, and the mid- and late 2000s. (If anything, the study understates inequality because it does not include income from capital gains, which go overwhelmingly to those at the top.)
Growth in wage inequality has been the biggest factor contributing to the large and growing income gaps in most states. Wages of the highest-paid employees have grown significantly. At the same time, wage growth at the bottom and middle of the wage scale has been stagnant or modest for a number of reasons, including long periods of high unemployment, more intense competition from foreign firms, a shift from manufacturing to service jobs, and a minimum wage that has not kept up with price increases. Government actions — and, in some cases, inaction — have contributed to the increase in wage and income inequality in most states.
The richest households also reaped the benefits of rising investment income in the form of dividends, rent, interest, and capital gains, which primarily accrue to those at the top.
The consequences of growing income inequality reach beyond individual families. For instance, in order to compete in the future economy, states and the nation as a whole need a highly-skilled workforce. But research shows that children from poor families don’t perform as well in school and are likely to be less-prepared for the jobs of the future. Moreover, as income gaps widen, wealthy households become increasingly isolated from poor and middle-income communities. This hurts the nation’s sense of community and shared interests, for example, undermining support for public schools and other building blocks of economic growth.
While inequality results to a significant degree from economic forces that are largely outside state policymakers’ control, state policies can mitigate the effects of these outside forces. State options include:
“As state policymakers plan their budgets for next year, they should pursue policies that push back against the trend of rising inequality,” said McNichol. “States that narrow — rather than widen — income gaps will reap economic benefits in the long run.”
| Table A: Top Ten States For Selected Income Inequality Measures | |
| Greatest Income Inequality Between the Top and the Bottom, Late-2000s | Greatest Income Inequality Between the Top and the Middle, Late-2000s |
| 1. New Mexico | 1. New Mexico |
| 2. Arizona | 2. California |
| 3. California | 3. Georgia |
| 4. Georgia | 4. Mississippi |
| 5. New York | 5. Arizona |
| 6. Louisiana | 6. New York |
| 7. Texas | 7. Texas |
| 8. Massachusetts | 8. Oklahoma |
| 9. Illinois | 9. Tennessee |
| 10. Mississippi | 10. Louisiana |
| Greatest Increases in Income Inequality Between the Top and the Bottom, Late 1990s to Mid-2000s | Greatest Increases in Income Inequality Between the Top and the Middle, Late 1990s to Mid-2000s |
| 1. Mississippi | 1. Mississippi |
| 2. South Dakota | 2. New Mexico |
| 3. Connecticut | 3. Illinois |
| 4. Illinois | 4. South Dakota |
| 5. Alabama | 5. Alabama |
| 6. Indiana | 6. Connecticut |
| 7. Massachusetts | 7. Missouri |
| 8. Colorado | 8. Colorado |
| 9. Kentucky | 9. Florida |
| 10. New Mexico | 10. Oregon |
| Greatest Increases in Income Inequality Between the Top and the Bottom, Late 1970s to Mid-2000s | Greatest Increases in Income Inequality Between the Top and the Middle, Late 1970s to Mid-2000s |
| 1. Connecticut | 1. Connecticut |
| 2. Massachusetts | 2. California |
| 3. New York | 3. Oklahoma |
| 4. Kentucky | 4. New York |
| 5. Illinois | 5. New Mexico |
| 6. California | 6. Illinois |
| 7. West Virginia | 7. Oregon |
| 8. Colorado | 8. Texas |
| 9. Rhode Island | 9. Massachusetts |
| 10. Mississippi | 10. Rhode Island |
The full report, Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends, and state-specific infographics is available at http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3860.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization and policy institute that conducts research and analysis on a range of government policies and programs. It is supported primarily by foundation grants.
Alabama
Arise Citizens’ Policy Project
Chris Sanders
334-832-9060
chris@alarise.org
Arizona
Children's Action Alliance
Karen McLaughlin
602-266-0707 ext. 207
kmclaughlin@azchildren.org
Arkansas
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families
Brett Kincaid
501-378-9678 ext. 110
bkincaid@aradvocates.org
California
California Budget Project
Steven Bliss
916-444-0500
sbliss@cbp.org
Connecticut
Connecticut Voices for Children
Wade Gibson
203-498-4240 ext. 113
wgibson@ctvoices.org
District of Columbia
DC Fiscal Policy Institute
Jenny Reed
202-325-8812
reed@dcfpi.org
Georgia
Georgia Budget and Policy Institute
Wesley Tharpe
404-420-1324
wtharpe@gbpi.org
Illinois
Voices for Illinois Children
Larry Joseph
312-516-5556
ljoseph@voices4kids.org
Iowa
Iowa Policy Project
Mike Owen
319-331-1287
mikeowen@iowapolicyproject.org
Kansas
Kansas Action for Children
Shannon Cotsoradis
785-232-0550
shannon@kac.org
Kentucky
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy
Jason Bailey
859-986-2373
jbailey@kypolicy.org
Louisiana
Louisiana Budget Project
Karen Miller
225-925-2601
karenmiller@lano.org
Maryland
Maryland Budget & Tax Policy Institute
Benjamin Orr
443-438-2345
borr@mdnonprofit.org
Massachusetts
Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center
Evan Horowitz
617-426-1228 ext. 100
ehorowitz@massbudget.org
Michigan
Michigan League for Public Policy
Judy Putnam
517-487-5436
jputnam@mlpp.org
Minnesota
Minnesota Budget Project
Barb Brady
651-757-3076
bbrady@mnbudgetproject.org
Mississippi
Mississippi Economic Policy Center
Krista Buckhalter
601-944-4174
kbuckhalter@mepconline.org
Missouri
Missouri Budget Project
Amy Blouin
314-518-8867
ablouin@mobudget.org
Montana
Montana Budget and Policy Center
Tara Veazey
406-422-7320
tveazey@montanabudget.org
New Hampshire
Jeff McLynch
New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute
603.856.8337 ext. 1
jmclynch@nhfpi.org
New Jersey
New Jersey Policy Perspective
Jon Whiten
609-393-1145 ext. 15
whiten@njpp.org
New Mexico
New Mexico Voices for Children
Gerry Bradley
505-244-9505 ext. 23
gbradley@nmvoices.org
New York
Fiscal Policy Institute
Frank Mauro
518-786-3156 or 518-469-6680
mauro@fiscalpolicy.org
North Carolina
North Carolina Budget & Tax Center
Alexandra Sirota
919-861-1468
alexandra@ncjustice.org
Ohio
Policy Matters Ohio
Amy Hanauer
216-361-9801
ahanauer@policymattersohio.org
Oklahoma
Oklahoma Policy Institute
Gene Perry
918-794-3944
gperry@okpolicy.org
Oregon
Juan Carlos Ordonez
Oregon Center for Public Policy
503-310-7138
jcordonez@ocpp.org
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center
Chris Lilienthal
717-255-7156 or 717-829-4823
lilienthal@pennbpc.org
Rhode Island
Economic Progress Institute
Kate Brewster
401-486-9532
kbrewster@economicprogressri.org
South Dakota
South Dakota Budget & Policy Project
Joy Smolnisky
605-367-9667
joys@sdbudgetandpolicyproject.org
Texas
Center for Public Policy Priorities
Don Baylor
512-823-2879
baylor@cppp.org
Utah
Allison Rowland
Voices for Utah Children
801-364-1182
allison@utahchildren.org
Vermont
Public Assets Institute
Paul Cillo
802-223-6677
paul@publicassets.org
Virginia
The Commonwealth Institute
Patrick Getlein
804-396-2051
patrick@thecommonwealthinstitute.org
Washington
Washington State Budget & Policy Center
Tara Lee
206-851-4452
taral@budgetandpolicy.org
Economic Opportunity Institute
Aaron Keating
206-529-6371
aaron@eoionline.org
West Virginia
West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy
Stuart Frazier
304-720-8682
sfrazier@wvpolicy.org
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Budget Project
Bob Jacobson
608-284-0580, ext. 303
bjacobson@wccf.org
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization and policy institute that conducts research and analysis on a range of government policies and programs. It is supported primarily by foundation grants.
Communications Specialist