Businesses
Results per page: 50 | 100
Results by year: 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006
-
House Health Bill’s High-Income Surcharge is Sound and Well Targeted
Updated November 20, 2009
A 5.4 percent surcharge on couples with incomes over $1 million, a key financing feature of the House health reform bill, is sound and well targeted. It would affect just a fraction of 1 percent of taxpayers, a group whose incomes have soared and tax burdens have fallen in recent years, and would have only a modest impact on small businesses. … -
House Health Bill’s High-Income Surcharge: A Reasonable Approach
Revised July 30, 2009
Reforming the health care system to provide universal health coverage is an urgent priority. But, facing huge projected budget deficits that have the nation on an unsustainable fiscal path, the White House and Congress must enact a health reform plan that is also fully financed and that reduces the growth rate of health care … -
Limiting the Tax Exclusion for Employer-Sponsored Insurance Can Help Pay for Health Reform
Revised June 4, 2009
Limiting the tax exclusion for employer-sponsored health insurance could provide significant revenues for health reform without eroding employer-sponsored insurance or causing other undesirable side effects — if the cap and the rest of the health reform legislation are well designed and contain several key features that past proposals have lacked. … -
Statement: Chuck Marr, Director of Federal Tax Policy, on the Administration’s International Tax Proposal
May 4, 2009
The Administration’s proposal is a welcome step forward in tax policy because it would make the tax code more balanced, support research and development, and promote fiscal responsibility. Specifically, it would tighten lax international tax rules and … -
History Contradicts Claim That President’s Budget Would Harm Small Business Job Creation
March 26, 2009
Critics have claimed that President Obama’s proposal to roll back tax cuts for families with incomes above $250,000 would kill job growth in the small business sector. But under the Clinton Administration, when the tax treatment of high-income families was very similar to what President Obama has proposed, small businesses … -
Testimony: Robert Greenstein on Tax Proposals in the President's Budget before the Senate Committee on Finance
March 26, 2009
I appreciate the invitation to appear before the Committee today. I am Robert Greenstein, Executive Director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a policy institute that focuses on fiscal policy issues and issues affecting low- and moderate-income families. This testimony makes the following points: As the Congressional … -
Limiting Itemized Deductions for Upper-Income Taxpayers Would Have Little Effect on Small Business, Charities, Housing
March 12, 2009
Despite persistent claims to the contrary, the President’s proposal to cap the value of itemized deductions at 28 percent would have only small effects on small business, charitable giving, and homeownership. That’s because the proposal, which would save $318 billion over the next ten years to help finance health care reform, would affect only those tax … -
Very Few Small Business Owners Would Face Tax Increases Under President's Budget
February 28, 2009
Some critics of the President’s budget charge that his proposals to roll back tax breaks for taxpayers with incomes over $250,000 would harm small businesses. In fact, only 8.9 percent of people with any small business income have incomes of over $250,000 and, thus, would even potentially be affected by these provisions. (See … -
New Analysis Shows "Tax Expenditures" Overall Are Costly and Regressive
February 23, 2009
“Tax expenditures” for individuals totaled about $760.5 billion in 2007, topping what the federal government spent on either national defense or all non-defense discretionary programs, a new analysis by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center (TPC) shows.[1] In most cases, these tax expenditures are also regressive — that is, they benefit … -
Big Misconceptions about Small Businesses and Taxes
Updated February 2, 2009
Supporters of various tax benefits for high-income households often claim that failure to maintain them would have an undue effect on many small businesses. But even assuming a broad definition of “small business,” such claims are often exaggerated or false. This paper examines three such claims. First, critics … -
The High Cost of Estate Tax Repeal
Revised January 28, 2009
Making permanent the repeal of the estate tax after 2010 — repeatedly proposed by President Bush— would add almost $1.3 trillion to the deficit between fiscal years 2012 and 2021, the first ten years in which the full costs of extending repeal would be reflected in the budget. This cost includes $1 trillion of lost revenues … -
Putting U.S. Corporate Taxes in Perspective
October 27, 2008
The U.S. corporate tax burden is smaller than average for developed countries.[1] Corporations in 19 of the member states of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development paid 16.1 percent of their profits in taxes between 2000 and 2005, on average, while corporations in the United States paid 13.4 percent. … -
Bonus Depreciation Tax Cut Unlikely To Provide Effective Economic Stimulus
September 10, 2008
Stimulus legislation enacted in February included a provision that increased the tax deduction which businesses can claim when they purchase certain types of equipment and place it in service during the 2008 tax year. Suggestions are being made that this “bonus depreciation” provision — a form of accelerated … -
Evidence Shows That Tax Cuts Lose Revenue
Revised July 21, 2008
The claim that tax cuts “pay for themselves” — i.e., cause so much economic growth that revenues rise faster than they would have without the tax cut — has been made repeatedly in recent years and is one of the many tax policy issues that is likely to receive renewed attention in light of the upcoming … -
House-Passed Housing Tax Package Improves Significantly on Senate Version: But Addressing the Foreclosure Crisis Will Require Other Measures
Revised June 17, 2008
On April 10, the Senate passed a bill comprised largely of housing-related tax cuts. [1] Six weeks later, the House passed its own housing legislation including its own package of housing-related tax measures. Some of the provisions in House-passed housing tax package have merit, and the House-passed tax package represents a … -
Well-Designed, Fiscally Responsible Corporate Tax Reform Could Benefit the Economy: Unpaid-For Rate Cuts Would Likely Hurt Most Americans in the Long Run
June 4, 2008
Over the past year, proposals for federal corporate tax cuts and corporate tax reform have received increasing attention. The corporate income tax appears to have joined the long list of tax issues likely to be addressed, or at least debated, over the next few years. Already, two different approaches have emerged. In … -
Senate Housing Legislation Highly Disappointing: Less Than One-Fourth of Cost of Senate Bill Goes for Provisions That Will Actually Help Address the Foreclosure Crisis
Revised May 12, 2008
On April 10, the Senate passed legislation that its supporters say will help struggling families hold on to their homes and assist the communities hit hardest by the foreclosure crisis. Measures that would help achieve these goals, however, account for less than one-fourth of the bill’s cost. The remainder of the cost comes … -
Tax Cuts: Myths and Realities
Updated May 9, 2008
Since 2001, the Administration and Congress have enacted a wide array of tax cuts, including reductions in individual income tax rates, repeal of the estate tax, and reductions in capital gains and dividend taxes. Nearly all of these tax cuts are scheduled to expire by the end of 2010. Making them permanent would cost about $4.4 trillion over the next decade (when the cost of … -
Net Operating Loss Measure under Consideration In Senate Has Low Bang-For-The-Buck As Stimulus: No Justification for Waiving PAYGO for the Provision
February 26, 2008
According to news accounts, the Senate will soon consider a housing stimulus package (S. 2636), introduced by Senator Reid earlier this month.[1] While the package primarily targets the housing market, it also includes a measure dealing with business net operating losses. A business experiences a “net operating … -
The Dubious Priorities of the President's FY 2009 Budget
Revised February 7, 2008
The President’s budget would provide more tax cuts heavily skewed to the most well-off while cutting vital services for low- and moderate-income Americans, generating large deficits, and increasing the strain on states already confronting budget problems as a result of the economic downturn. The budget … -
Repatriation Measure Unlikely to Stimulate the U.S. Economy or Boost U.S. Investment — But Will Promote Investment in Tax Havens and Undermine the Corporate Income Tax
January 30, 2008
When the Senate Finance Committee considers stimulus legislation today, Senator John Ensign is expected to offer an amendment dealing with repatriated foreign earnings. Modeled on a provision included in the 2004 American Jobs Creation Act, Senator Ensign’s amendment would create a tax holiday during which repatriated … -
Myths and Realities About Changing the Tax Treatment of Private Equity Fund Managers
November 8, 2007
Economists across the political system generally concur that eliminating the tax break for “carried interest” income, a form of compensation received by private equity fund managers, would improve the equity and efficiency of the tax system.[1] The tax code is more efficient when it creates a level playing field. The fact that carried interest income is taxed at the … -
Higher Taxes on Carried Interest Would Be Borne By Investment Fund Managers
September 19, 2007
In the past few weeks, the Senate Finance and the House Ways and Means Committee have both held hearings investigating the tax treatment of carried interest, a form of compensation prevalent in the private equity industry. As part of their contractual arrangement with investors, the managers of a private equity fund typically … -
Making the “Internet Tax Freedom Act” Permanent Could Lead to a Substantial Revenue Loss for States and Localities
Revised August 30, 2007
On May 23 and July 26, 2007, the Senate Commerce Committee and the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the House Judiciary Committee, respectively, held hearings on the “Internet Tax Freedom Act” (ITFA). ITFA was enacted in 1998 and renewed in 2001 and 2004. The law generally bars state and local taxation … -
The 2001 and 2003 Tax Cuts and Small Business
March 21, 2007
The Bush Administration and Congressional supporters of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts have often asserted that these tax cuts, and especially the reductions in the top two income tax rates, are of great value to small business. They argue that failure to extend these tax cuts would cause significant harm to small business owners. An examination of the relevant data demonstrates, … -
"Small Business" Tax Package in Senate Minimum Wage Bill Poses Fiscal Risks
February 27, 2007
On February 1, the Senate passed a minimum wage bill that includes a package of business tax cuts. The cost of these tax cuts is $8.3 billion over the ten years from 2007 to 2016. On February 16, the House of Representatives passed a much smaller package of business tax cuts, the cost of which is $1.5 billion between 2007 and 2016 (and $1.3 billion between 2007 and 2017[1]). … -
House Proposal to Reform Earmarks Employs Double Standard, Largely Exempting Earmarks Packaged as Special Interest Tax Breaks
September 14, 2006
The House is about to consider a change in its rules that would require any committee that includes an “earmark” in legislation to report the name of the Member who sponsored the earmark.[1] One aspect of this proposal jumps out: while earmarked funding would be subject to this rule, earmarked special-interest tax breaks would be exempt from the rule, except for tax breaks that … -
Comparing the House Minimum Wage and Estate Tax Proposals
Revised August 3, 2006
House leaders are following a legislative strategy that involves marrying an increase in the minimum wage to a sharp reduction in the estate tax. This approach juxtaposes policies that are aimed at two groups at opposite ends of the economic spectrum: minimum-wage workers for whom full-time work currently pays $10,700 a year, and individuals who … -
House Estate Tax Proposal Has Essentially the Same Large Long-Term Cost As Earlier Version
July 28, 2006
Just five weeks after passing legislation that would drastically reduce the estate tax (H.R. 5638), the House of Representatives is considering another estate-tax proposal. The House passed H.R. 5638 in the hope that it would attract the needed 60 votes in the Senate, but Senators who oppose repealing most or all of the estate tax did not embrace the House alternative, … -
High Cost of Thomas Proposal Reflects the Low Effective Tax Rates Estates Would Face Proposal’s Benefits Would Go Primarily to Largest Estates
Revised June 23, 2006
On June 22, the House passed legislation to sharply reduce the estate tax, and the Senate may vote on the legislation next week. Introduced by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas, the measure would exempt the first $10 million of an estate for a couple ($5 million for an individual) and would index this exemption for inflation after 2010.… -
Thomas Estate Tax Proposal Still "Near Repeal"
Revised June 23, 2006
On June 22, the House of Representatives passed estate-tax legislation (H.R. 5638), introduced by House Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas, that is very similar to — and even slightly more costly than — the most recent estate-tax proposal floated by Senator Jon Kyl. Both proposals would cost nearly as much as permanent repeal of the … -
New Estate Tax Anecdotes Dredge Up Old Myth That the Estate Tax Claims Half of an Estate
June 14, 2006
Opponents of the estate tax often claim that it forces estates to pay half of their assets in taxes. For example, during the Senate debate on the estate tax earlier this month, Senator Jon Kyl told the story of a businessman whose family allegedly had to pay “half of the value of [his] company to the government.” Senator Kyl went so far … -
New Joint Tax Committee Estimates Show Modified Kyl Proposal Still Very Costly
Revised June 13, 2006
On June 8, the Senate rejected, by a vote of 57-41, a motion to consider permanent repeal of the estate tax (under Senate rules, the measure required 60 votes to pass). During the lead-up to the vote, Senator Jon Kyl floated a modification of his longstanding “compromise” proposal to repeal most but not quite all of the estate tax. … -
New Joint Committee on Taxation Estimates of Estate Tax Repeal Show Slightly Higher Costs
June 9, 2006
The Joint Committee on Taxation this week released new estimates of the cost of making permanent the repeal of the estate tax after 2010. These estimates of the cost of H.R. 8, the measure that passed the House last year (and that the Senate voted on June 8 not to consider), show that permanent repeal would cost $386.5 billion between 2007 and 2016.… -
Estate Tax Repeal Would Decrease National Saving
June 8, 2006
Repeal of the estate tax would add about $1 trillion to federal deficits over the first decade in which its costs would be fully felt (2012-2021). These higher deficits would reduce national savings, with the consequence that, in the long run, estate tax repeal would have at best negligible, and possibly negative, effects on the economy. Surprisingly, … -
Estate Tax Repeal — or Slashing The Estate Tax Rate — Would Substantially Reduce Charitable Giving
June 7, 2006
Repealing the estate tax would substantially reduce U.S. charitable giving, according to research by the Congressional Budget Office and various economists. As CBO’s study explains, the estate tax creates powerful incentives for affluent individuals to donate to charity. Since donations made both during life and at death reduce the size of an estate and thus the amount subject … -
Estate Tax "Compromise" With 15 Percent Rate Is Little Different Than Permanent Repeal
Revised June 2, 2006
The Senate is expected to vote on estate tax repeal in June of this year. Permanent repeal of the estate tax would cost nearly $1 trillion between 2012 and 2021, the first ten year period in which its costs would be fully felt. (This cost includes $776 billion in revenue loss and $213 billion in higher interest payments on the federal debt.[1]) In … -
The State of the Estate Tax as of 2006
Revised June 2, 2006
With the Senate preparing to vote on permanent repeal of the estate tax in June, it is important to take stock of the changes that have already been made to the tax. As a result of legislation enacted in 2001, the portion of an estate that is exempt from taxation has more than doubled since 2000 and stands at $2 million ($4 million per couple) in 2006.… -
The House-Passed Budget Plan
Revised May 22, 2006
In the early morning of May 18, the House passed a budget plan (or “budget resolution”) for fiscal year 2007. In a separate vote later that day, the Housed “deemed” that the Congress has given final approval to the plan. As a result of this “deemer,” the House budget plan is now … -
House Leadership Seeks To Invoke "Martial Law," Forcing Members To Vote On Key Budget Bills Without Full Knowledge Of What They Are Voting On
December 18, 2005
The House Republican Leadership has announced its intention to have the House vote today on conference reports on a budget-cut “reconciliation” bill (S. 1932) and the defense appropriation bill (H.R. 2863) under a procedure known as “martial law.” The … -
Temporary Provisions in the Corporate Tax Bill Mask Its Likely Long-Term Impact on the Deficit
October 7, 2004
The conference committee chaired by House Ways and Means Chair Bill Thomas completed work on the corporate tax bill on October 6, and the House and Senate are expected to vote on the measure before adjourning this week. The bill would take the positive step of repealing … -
The Anticipated Corporate Tax Package: Watch Out For Gimmicks and Giveaways
October 4, 2004
A Congressional conference committee, chaired by House Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas, is scheduled to meet late on October 4 to finalize a package of corporate tax changes. The package will raise revenue primarily by repealing an export subsidy that the World Trade Organization has ruled to be illegal, closing some … -
Fact Sheet: Corporate Tax Revenues At Historic Lows Even Before Proposed Costly New Tax Breaks
Revised October 24, 2003
A new Center report, The Decline of Corporate Income Tax Revenues, provides context for the debate over corporate tax-cut legislation now before Congress. It shows that corporate tax revenues have fallen to historically low levels as a share of total federal revenues and of the economy. Despite the weakening of … -
The Decline of Corporate Income Tax Revenues
Revised October 24, 2003
A weak economy, new tax breaks, and aggressive tax sheltering have pushed corporate income tax receipts down to historically low levels, both relative to the size of the economy and as a share of total federal revenues. According to the most recent budget projections of the Congressional Budget Office, corporate revenues will remain at historically low levels even after …
