October 8, 2004

SEPTEMBER JOB GROWTH IS ONLY ONE-THIRD OF AVERAGE
 JOB GROWTH FOR AN ECONOMIC RECOVERY PERIOD

Growth Falls Well Behind What President's Economic Advisers Predicted and Characterized as Average
by

PDF of this analysis

View Related Reports

If you cannot access the files through the links, right-click on the underlined text, click "Save Link As," download to your directory, and open the document in Adobe Acrobat Reader.

The number of jobs grew by 96,000 in September.  This is one-third the job growth of 300,000 per month that would have been achieved if job growth had occurred at the rate that is average for a recovery, according to the definition of average used by the chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers.  This continues a pattern predominant during the past year of job growth; with few exceptions, this growth has lagged behind — and usually well behind — the pace of job growth typically associated with a recovery period.

A Rise in Long-term Unemployment

After falling modestly for several months, the number of people out of work for 27 weeks or more increased in September.  There were 1.747 million long-term unemployed in September, up from 1.664 million in August.  The share of the unemployed who are long-term unemployed also increased, to 21.8 percent — or one of every five unemployed individuals.  The labor market continues to be marked by persistent high levels of long-term unemployment.


End Notes:

[1] Reuters News Service, “White House advisor says sees big job gains in 2004,” February 10, 2004.  The Administration later backed off this CEA projection somewhat.  For a detailed analysis of CEA’s 2004 projection, see two reports co-authored by Jared Bernstein, Lee Price, and Isaac Shapiro, “White House Backs Off CEA Prediction of ‘Average’ Job Growth,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, February 18, 2004; and “Missing the Moving Target,” February 12, 2004, Appendix Table B.

[2] The Bureau of Labor Statistics, “The Employment Situation:  September 2004,” October 8, 2004.

[3] BLS made a preliminary estimate that “total nonfarm payroll employment will require an upward revision of approximately 236,000, or two-tenths of one percent, for the March 2004 reference month.”  If this preliminary estimate is accurate, then monthly job growth averaged about 20,000 higher than reported over the 12-month period preceding March 2004.  This would translate into job growth averaging 157,000 from November 2003 through September 2004, little different from the 148,000 figure used above.  (Again, the 148,000 figure reflects the official data now available.)