May 22, 2001

LOW-INCOME FAMILIES WITH A FULL-TIME WORKING PARENT WOULD FARE MUCH BETTER
UNDER SENATE THAN HOUSE CHILD CREDIT PROVISION

Under House Provision, Six Times As Many Such Families Would Be Left Out

View PDF version

If you cannot access the file through the link, right-click on the underlined text, click "Save Link As," download to your directory, and open the document in Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Some 4.3 million low-income families with a full-time working parent or parents would fail to benefit from the expansion of the child credit in the House tax bill. By contrast, 700,000 such families  — fewer than one-sixth as many  — would fail to benefit under the Senate child credit expansion.

These data are from an analysis conducted by Isabel Sawhill and Adam Thomas of the Brookings Institution, using Census data. Full-time is defined as work of more than 1,500 hours during the year.

 

Number of Full-time Working Families*
with Children Who Would Not Benefit
From Child Credit Expansion

House

4.3 million

Senate

0.7 million

*Defined as a family in which the head worked at least 1,500 hours during the year.

Source: Isabel Sawhill and Adam Thomas, Brookings Institution

CBPP!

Home | Background Information | Board of Directors | Center Staff
Search | Publication Library | Job Opportunities | Internship Information
State Policy Work Home Page

CBPP!

Click here to join the Center's e-mail notification list.
To ask questions, or send comments, write to bazie@cbpp.org
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510
Washington, DC  20002
Ph: (202) 408-1080
Fax: (202) 408-1056