Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Revised May 19, 2008

FAMILIES HELPED BY THE CHILD TAX CREDIT EXPANSION
WORK HARD IN LOW-PAYING JOBS
Nursing Home Aides, Cooks, Pre-School Teachers, and
Construction Workers Would Get a Boost

by Sharon Parrott, and Arloc Sherman

The tax “extenders” bill adopted last week in the House Ways and Means Committee (H.R. 6049) would temporarily expand the Child Tax Credit by lowering the earnings threshold that families must meet to qualify for the refundable portion of the credit.  Under the bill, families would qualify for a refundable CTC if their earnings exceeded $8,500; under current law, by contrast, families must have earnings above $12,050 in 2008 to qualify for the refundable child tax credit.

According to the Tax Policy Center, this provision would benefit 13 million children — including 2.9 million children who would become newly eligible for the benefit and 10.1 million children who would see their CTC increased due to this provision.  Families that are “newly eligible” are those with incomes between $8,500 and $12,050.  A broader group of low-income families would see their CTC increase as a result of this provision, because the size of their credit is based on the amount by which the family’s earnings exceed the threshold.

Who are these families that would benefit?  Census datai provide important information about these families and the jobs the parents hold:

  • Most of the children helped live in families in which a parent works throughout the year.  Some 70 percent of the children who would benefit live in families in which a parent works 30 or more hours per week for at least 50 weeks during the year.  A majority of the remaining families experienced periods of unemployment during the year, but when employed worked at least 30 hours per week.
  • Many of the children helped live in families that include individuals with disabilities.  Nearly one in ten children — 1.1 million children — who would benefit live in a family where either a parent or a child has a disability.  An expanded CTC would provide assistance to these families in which parents struggle to maintain jobs and meet the health and other expenses they incur due to the disability.
  • The parents who would be assisted work in a broad range of low paying jobs; many perform difficult jobs that provide critical services, such as caring for the elderly or teaching young children.
     
    • 480,000 parents provide health care services to the elderly or the ill as nursing home workers, home health aides, personal care assistants, medical assistants, and other low-paid health care professionals.
       
    • 240,000 parents provide child care, serve as teaching assistants, or are preschool or kindergarten teachers.
       
    • 310,000 parents earn a living by cleaning or maintaining the grounds of homes, office buildings, schools, or other community institutions.
       
    • 410,000 parents work as cashiers in grocery stores and a broad array of other businesses.
       
    • 470,000 parents work as cooks, waiters or waitresses, or assist cooks with food preparation.
       
    • 360,000 parents earn a living as construction workers, carpenters, or painters.
       
    • 120,000 parents work as laborers in the agriculture sector.

Table 1 provides state-by-state estimates of the number of children who would benefit from the proposed CTC expansion.

TABLE 1:
Number of Children Who Would Benefit From the Child Tax Credit Provision Included in the Tax “Extenders” Bill

State

Children Newly Eligible for the Credit

Children Receiving a Larger Credit

Alabama

         52,711

 

182,594

Alaska

           5,271

 

 18,259

Arizona

         77,017

 

266,760

Arkansas

         33,677

 

116,657

California

       458,589

 

1,588,565

Colorado

         40,705

 

141,003

Connecticut

         19,620

 

67,965

Delaware

           6,443

 

22,317

D.C.

           4,685

 

16,231

Florida

       169,555

 

587,343

Georgia

         96,638

 

334,755

Hawaii

         11,128

 

38,548

Idaho

         18,742

 

64,922

Illinois

       114,794

 

397,648

Indiana

         58,568

 

202,882

Iowa

         22,256

 

77,095

Kansas

         27,527

 

95,354

Kentucky

         37,191

 

128,830

Louisiana

         50,662

 

175,493

Maine

           8,492

 

29,418

Maryland

         35,141

 

121,729

Massachusetts

         32,213

 

111,585

Michigan

         88,145

 

305,337

Minnesota

         34,848

 

120,715

Mississippi

         36,898

 

127,816

Missouri

         55,347

 

191,723

Montana

           8,200

 

28,403

Nebraska

         14,935

 

51,735

Nevada

         26,649

 

92,311

New Hampshire

           4,685

 

16,231

New Jersey

         58,568

 

202,882

New Mexico

         27,234

 

94,340

New York

       161,355

 

558,940

North Carolina

         96,345

 

333,741

North Dakota

           4,393

 

15,216

Ohio

         94,588

 

327,654

Oklahoma

         40,119

 

138,974

Oregon

         34,848

 

120,715

Pennsylvania

         91,659

 

317,510

Rhode Island

           8,492

 

29,418

South Carolina

         45,390

 

157,233

South Dakota

           7,028

 

24,346

Tennessee

         60,032

 

207,954

Texas

       344,967

 

1,194,974

Utah

         31,041

 

107,527

Vermont

           4,685

 

16,231

Virginia

         50,954

 

176,507

Washington

         52,711

 

182,594

West Virginia

         17,863

 

61,879

Wisconsin

         40,412

 

139,988

Wyoming

           4,393

 

15,216

United States

    2,928,412

 

10,144,093

Source:  Tax Policy Center national estimate, distributed by state based on CBPP analysis of the 2005 American Community Survey


End Note:

i All of the figures presented here are CBPP calculations based on the March 2006 Current Population Survey.  Estimates of the number of children who would benefit from the CTC provisions that are based on the March 2006 Current Population Survey are somewhat lower than those computed by the Tax Policy Center.  Because TPC has more complete data on tax filing units and tax filers’ taxable income than are available from the Census Bureau, the TPC figures on the total number of children who would benefit are generally considered more accurate than the estimates using the March CPS data.  Thus, the estimates we compute from the March CPS data were adjusted to match the TPC figures for the total number of children helped.  (The TPC data do not provide information about the characteristics of those helped; that information is only available from the detailed information collected by the Census Bureau.)

 
Document Resources:
  pdf PDF of full report (3pp.)
  E-mail to a friend
  Print
Report Categories:
  All Reports by Date
  Federal Tax Policy
CBPP Services:
  E-mail Notifications
  RSS Alerts

Home | Background | Donate  | Board of Directors | Staff | Search | Jobs | Internships  | State Policy Work Home Page | Press Room

Click here to join the Center's e-mail notification list.
To ask questions, or send comments, write to bazie@cbpp.org
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510
Washington, DC  20002
Ph: (202) 408-1080
Fax: (202) 408-1056